The strategies that can be used successfully with this type of bet are Martingale and Fibonacci, which we find very interesting and clever indeed. It was very impressive, however, that none of the participants ended up completely losing their bankrolls, which is very interesting indeed. Playing for the remainder of this 500-round sequence ended up costing him instead. The idea here is to quit while you are ahead, as Player 4 clearly was. Once again, Player 1 and 2 were playing with small amounts, so they didn’t have to worry. Then again, Player 3’s bankroll seemed to be veering off rather rapidly, and Player 4 then experienced the highest peaks and the lowest results overall. Here are the results:įrom the immediate results, we can clearly see that Player 1 and Player 2 maintained steady results throughout the entire action. The starting bankroll for each of these players was $1,000.

The simulation we used ran across 500 sessions and included four players that used betting units as follows: Player 1 ($1), Player 2 ($1), Player 3 ($3) and Player 4 ($5). So, we will now take a look at how efficient straight-up bets are and what to expect.

Roulette odds of winning